Monday, June 24, 2024
HomeHR JobsDOL extends remark interval for impartial contractor rule after stakeholder stress

DOL extends remark interval for impartial contractor rule after stakeholder stress

[ad_1]

This audio is auto-generated. Please tell us you probably have suggestions.

The U.S. Division of Labor will give stakeholders till Dec. 13 — roughly an additional two weeks — to touch upon its proposed modifications for impartial contractors following complaints from enterprise teams concerning the unique timeline.

The company earlier this month proposed a rule change that, if finalized, is anticipated to extend the variety of employees companies would wish to classify as workers. The general public was invited to remark for 45 days however teams such because the U.S. Chamber of Commerce urged the company to provide them extra time.

“Given the big variety of firms and sole proprietors who can be affected by this regulation, and the intense considerations now we have with the proposal, extra time is required to interact with companies and solicit enter on how this proposed rule would impression their operations,” the Chamber wrote in its request, asking DOL for an extra 45 days.

The Nationwide Affiliation of House Builders urged the company to supply an additional 60 days, saying DOL “severely underestimated” the time firms would wish to evaluation the rule and estimate its potential monetary impression on their companies.

Employer representatives that already filed feedback have largely requested DOL to rethink its proposal, arguing that such an growth of protection would require a full overhaul for some firms and hamper already strained expertise acquisition efforts at others.

Rideshare firms corresponding to Uber and Lyft, nonetheless — the employers at which such coverage modifications typically have been aimed — have mentioned the proposal wouldn’t upend their fashions.

People working as impartial contractors voiced combined opinions in feedback to DOL. A rideshare driver, for instance, supplied assist for the proposal. Quite a few writers, court docket reporters and others, nonetheless, expressed sturdy opposition. 

“Sure, these Uber and Lyft drivers want employee protections,” wrote Michelle Liggitt, a self-described freelancer, in a remark to DOL; “However this rule is overly broad and would have huge unfavorable impacts far outweighing the assistance it would give to that small subset of gig employees.”

[ad_2]

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

Recent Comments